What should agencies rely on for the best determination when the original entry cannot be validated?

When agencies are faced with the challenge of validating an original entry, relying on the best information and knowledge available is crucial. This approach emphasizes the use of accurate, relevant, and up-to-date data, as well as the expertise of personnel involved in the determination process. By prioritizing informed decision-making, agencies can make the most reasonable assessment in the absence of verified entries.

This choice allows for adaptability, as it encourages the integration of various sources of information, including reports, records, and insights from experienced individuals within the agency. In situations where official validation is not possible, drawing on the collective expertise and context-specific information available ensures that the decisions made are grounded in reality and practicality.

In contrast, general guidelines may not always provide the specific context necessary for informed decisions, while state-level policies can vary significantly and might not be applicable to every situation. Legal counsel’s advice is important but may focus more on compliance issues rather than practical decision-making based on the available data. Thus, the best option for agencies striving to make sound determinations in complex scenarios is to utilize the best information and knowledge available to them.